readme added

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+# PARanodi SECuruty 3 protocol
+
+This is a connection-agnostic, full-duplex RPC type binary protocol, effective to work with binary data, such as encrypted data, keys, multimedia, etc. Its key points are:
+
+- simple and practical transport RPC layer, which is a primary choice when, for exaple, `wss://` level by TSL is enough, e.g. when there is no sensitive data being transmitted (games, etc).
+
+- can easily be used with UDP (it has not too big binary frames that do not depend on the reception order)
+
+- asynchronous full-duplex multithreaded RPC: any number commands from both parties can be executed in parallel.
+
+- coroutine-based, fast implementation.
+
+- compile-time types/invokation checks
+
+- out of the box fast coroutine based websocket client (JVM+JS) and setver (JVM:ktor) implementations are provided.
+
+- Kotlin Multiplatform: works the same in JVM/JS (and android too) 
+
+The protocol is a result of reconsidering the pratcial usage of its predecessor, parsec2 protocol. This version is not a part of the Universa effort but an independent personal project of universa CTO.
+
+## Status
+
+Transport layer for wbesockets is being tested in commercial environment, while its public interface still is in aplpha stage and is not yet frozen.
+
+Secure layer is not yet published, as R&D and desting are still under way.
+
+You can try and use transport layer but be prepared to minor interface changes.
+
+## Installation
+
+Insofar, we use localMaven: clone it and use `./gradlew publishToMavenLocal`, then add dependency:
+
+```kotlin
+repsitories {
+    // ...
+    mavenLocal()
+}
+
+//...
+    dependencies {
+        api("net.sergeych:parsec3:0.0.1-SNAPSHOT")
+    }
+```
+
+## Usage
+
+## FAQ
+
+### Why not github?
+
+Two reasons:
+
+1. I don't want to depend on US crazy ideas like limit usage of its services to anybody who their governent won't like next week.
+2. My ethic is against usage of open source in _paid services_ like gothub's copilot.
+
+### Why not universa?
+
+Again, two reasons:
+
+1. This is my own project, I don't want to get under any trademark, codes and whatever limits.
+
+2. Its security model is intended to be more universal than just universa to use more trust sources, so it is again not ethically adequate to develop it using universa resources.
+
+## LICENSE
+
+Will soon be published under MIT or similar.