added complext number support
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
418b1ae2b6
commit
cd007050a8
6 files changed
+424
-16
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
|
||||
# Complex Numbers (`lyng.complex`)
|
||||
|
||||
`lyng.complex` adds a pure-Lyng `Complex` type backed by `Real` components.
|
||||
|
||||
Import it when you want ordinary complex arithmetic:
|
||||
|
||||
```lyng
|
||||
import lyng.complex
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Construction
|
||||
|
||||
Use any of these:
|
||||
|
||||
```lyng
|
||||
import lyng.complex
|
||||
|
||||
val a = Complex(1.0, 2.0)
|
||||
val b = complex(1.0, 2.0)
|
||||
val c = 2.i
|
||||
val d = 3.re
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(Complex(1.0, 2.0), 1 + 2.i)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Convenience extensions:
|
||||
|
||||
- `Int.re`, `Real.re`: embed a real value into the complex plane
|
||||
- `Int.i`, `Real.i`: create a pure imaginary value
|
||||
- `cis(angle)`: shorthand for `cos(angle) + i sin(angle)`
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Operations
|
||||
|
||||
`Complex` supports:
|
||||
|
||||
- `+`
|
||||
- `-`
|
||||
- `*`
|
||||
- `/`
|
||||
- unary `-`
|
||||
- `conjugate`
|
||||
- `magnitude`
|
||||
- `phase`
|
||||
|
||||
Mixed arithmetic with `Int` and `Real` is enabled through `lyng.operators`, so both sides work naturally:
|
||||
|
||||
```lyng
|
||||
import lyng.complex
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(Complex(1.0, 2.0), 1 + 2.i)
|
||||
assertEquals(Complex(1.5, 2.0), 1.5 + 2.i)
|
||||
assertEquals(Complex(2.0, 2.0), 2.i + 2)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Mixed equality with built-in numeric types is intentionally not promised yet. Keep equality checks in the `Complex` domain for now.
|
||||
|
||||
## Transcendental Functions
|
||||
|
||||
For now, use member-style calls:
|
||||
|
||||
```lyng
|
||||
import lyng.complex
|
||||
|
||||
val z = 1 + π.i
|
||||
val w = z.exp()
|
||||
val s = z.sin()
|
||||
val r = z.sqrt()
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This is deliberate. Lyng already has built-in top-level real-valued functions such as `exp(x)` and `sin(x)`, and imported modules do not currently replace those root bindings. So plain `exp(z)` is not yet the right extension mechanism for complex math.
|
||||
|
||||
## Design Scope
|
||||
|
||||
This module intentionally uses `Complex` with `Real` parts, not `Complex<T>`.
|
||||
|
||||
Reasons:
|
||||
|
||||
- the existing math runtime is `Real`-centric
|
||||
- the operator interop registry works with concrete runtime classes
|
||||
- transcendental functions (`exp`, `sin`, `ln`, `sqrt`) are defined over the `Real` math backend here
|
||||
|
||||
If Lyng later gets a more general numeric-trait or callable-overload registry, a generic algebraic `Complex<T>` can be revisited on firmer ground.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user